March is an exciting month for colleges. The captivating national basketball tournaments are in full swing, students get to enjoy spring break, and long-lost academicians emerge from winter hibernation. And, if you happen to study at Boston University, you can follow along as your school has assumed a plaintiff’s role in a patent infringement lawsuit. Read more about Patent Wednesday: The Ole College Try[…]
One of the more common drugs featured in recent television advertisements is Celebrex®, a painkiller manufactured by pharmaceutical giant Pfizer®. Holding a patent on Celebrex® allows Pfizer® to exclusively make, use, sell, or offer to sell the drug. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted Pfizer® a “reissue” patent on the active ingredient Read more about Patent Wednesday: Pfizer® Takes a Hit[…]
If you own a patent, you enjoy the exclusive rights to make, use, sell, and offer for sale the underlying invention covered by that patent. Imagine if you own a patent and you decide to license the use of it to another entity. Then, the licensing entity embarks on an allegedly infringing activity. Whose burden Read more about Patent Wednesday: Revisiting Medtronic[…]
Whether you’re in the market for legal representation or car repair, one of the most important questions is how to minimize costs associated with services. In the United States, it’s typical for each litigating party to pay its own attorney fees no matter the outcome. But is it possible that one party could ever be Read more about Patent Wednesday: Who Pays the Bill?[…]
Our home state of New Jersey was front and center in the sports world this year for Super Bowl XLVIII. But, from an industrial standpoint, New Jersey is often viewed as a leader in one particular business: pharmaceuticals. On January 17, 2014, Judge Joel A. Pisano of the District of New Jersey sided with Warner Read more about Victory for the Patent Holder – Warner Chilcott v. Lupin and Amneal[…]
When the US Supreme Court elects to weigh in on matters of intellectual property, the legal landscape awaits their every word with bated breath. Two matters of the kind are currently before the Supreme Court: divided patent infringement liability and patentability of software. The adventure is just beginning. Divided Patent Infringement Liability: The Supreme Read more about IP News from the Supreme Court – December 2013[…]
If you own a patent, you know that you need to be aware of potential and actual infringers. After all, a patent grants an inventor the exclusive right to make, sell, and use an invention, and what good are those rights if someone else is doing just the same with an identical invention? Of course, Read more about How Invalidity can Trump Indirect Infringement: the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Commil v. Cisco[…]
If you own a patent, you know that you need to be aware of potential and actual infringers. After all, a patent grants an inventor the exclusive right to make, sell, and use an invention, and what good are those rights if someone else is doing just the same with an identical invention? Of course, Read more about How Invalidity can Trump Indirect Infringement: the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Commil v. Cisco[…]
Imagine if you could own your DNA. Sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? After all, we’re all born with our own genes and DNA – it’s our own individual blueprint – so why not get to own what is already naturally ours? Seems like one ought to be able to file for a patent for genes Read more about Patenting Human Genes: Slam the Brakes[…]
Intellectual property law forbids the patenting of abstract ideas. After all, imagine if someone had patented the immutable laws of physics – that person could have an infringement case against everyone under the sun. But, is a software-based invention inherently too abstract an idea to be patented? Software programmers who want to file patents hope Read more about Software Patenting: Another Setback[…]